Girl On A Hill

Well. It's yet another return to the studio. A welcome, welcoming occassion! Prints were stacked almost as high as me in the drying rack, so I dug mine out. I tried my hand at color today, after some discussion at the round table about digital prints versus 'prints', which got me thinking. Is it the image? Is it the embossing, the imprint, the clarity of line, the freeness of expression? Are all of the above necessary to make a print? What makes one a printmaker?
I find it interesting that photopolymer allows for photographic quality 'prints' (through the press). One can take any digital image and create a plate that can then be used to generate 'prints'; and in so doing one is called a printmaker.
But what if one swings the other way, like I do? Today, I made a series of monoprints that found there way into my computer and used in this image which I then printed, through my Epson.







